|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
June 24th, 2007, 02:59 | #1 |
MrChairsoft
|
M14 or Thompson?
Hey Guys, Evo Again.
Ive read many reviews on the TM M14 and the TM Thompson, im just looking for pros and cons from whoever has handled one on this board. I am pretty indecisive as I like both. Any of your Opinions would be a great help. Thanks, Evo. |
June 24th, 2007, 03:17 | #2 |
Formally SwattMedic
|
if your playing outdoor/long engagement M14 is the clear choice. If you plan on short engagments thompson is not bad. But for accuracy the M14 is the gun. I will admit the thompson has a great rate of fire and is a very nimble gun. The 14's length and weight are some what hard to get use to but once you do it is an amazing feild gun.
Just my 2cents
__________________
"Pain is just a symptom of weakness leaving the body" -Herb Ferh |
June 24th, 2007, 11:40 | #3 |
Troll
|
Have you ever held a Thompson?
The stock is reeeeeeally long on that puppy. Just throwing that out there... I love it but it might be awkward for some. Just a little something to keep in mind. |
June 24th, 2007, 11:43 | #4 |
Ministry of Peace
|
M14 all the way. Aside from looking really out of place at any modern scenario, the M1 is an obsolete airsoft rifle in comparison to the M14. So many advances were made in mechbox design between the release of the two, and the M14 is arguably TM's best product to date (apologies to P226 fans)
|
June 24th, 2007, 12:01 | #5 |
Official ASC Bladesmith
|
Both are dead sexy guns, I'd love to have both, but if I only had the choice of getting one, I'd get the M14 hands down. Besides, it's easier to get mags, pouches and accessories for.
|
June 24th, 2007, 16:18 | #6 |
AK Guru
|
Agreed, although I'd still trade my M14 for a Thompson.
Cheers, Alex |
June 24th, 2007, 17:12 | #7 | |
Quote:
As for the thompson vs. M14 thing...you rarely see a thompson at any game, you see lots of M14's around, its for a reason. I am dying to get my M14 up and running so I can start using it (wiring problem, motor heats up like crazy when the battery is plugged in even when not firing) but its on a waiting list with the local gun doc |
||
June 24th, 2007, 17:25 | #8 |
Just figured I'd chime in and say that I LOVE my M14 Socom. Even stock it's got amazing range. It has better long range accuracy at 290 fps than most guns with 350+. A fact that we discovered while prepping a dozen or so different hop-ups for a game. Granted it was the longest barreled gun we tested but nothing else could touch it in terms of getting the BB out there with minimal swerving. Other harder shotting guns could hit the target (and hit it harder too) but NOT without compensating for the distance to such an extent that the first few shots were alwats wasted.
It performs so well stock that I've had a new Spring, bushings, Spring guide, and steel gears sitting on my desk for who knows how long. If it ain't broke don't fix it I say. Realisticly though, they're both TMs, both newer mechboxs. Ergonomics and personal taste will probably be your main criteria. |
|
June 24th, 2007, 17:53 | #9 |
I'm greatly intersted in the M14, but I'm wondering if its better to go with TM or CA? I'm noticing that the TM is 100 bucks more yet the CA has more real steel parts. Just onwdering on any opinions out there?
__________________
I'm not fucking stupid... but I used to. |
|
June 24th, 2007, 18:41 | #10 |
don't forget the G&G m14... it comes with real wood furniture lol
|
|
June 24th, 2007, 18:41 | #11 |
personally i like the M1.
when it comes to upgrade ability. the M14 would win the M1 as metal bodies and wood stock and grips the M14 as a long list of parts. |
|
June 24th, 2007, 20:15 | #12 | |
Quote:
TM are known rock solid guns, G&G have a mechbox like a brick and are known for crappy shimming and lube out of the box so they need to be redone, and CA are supposedly a hybrid of the two, might be a good middle ground but there aren't that many reviews yet since their still fairly new. A team mate of mine has been using a stock first gen G&G M14 (not relubed/shimmed yet) and the accuracy and range is incredibly. At 320-330fps he can outrange an M16/AK/G36/etc. shooting 400fps even if they have a similar barrel length. I also have a G&G M14 but because of said wiring problem I haven't used it yet. There are some other difference. TM M14 has a 480mm barrel I believe, G&G is 520mm and its a 6.04mm tightbore out of the box. G&G can take mostly ver.2/3 internal parts but have a couple proprietary, TM have all ver.7 specific parts but there are far more aftermarket parts and accessories for them. |
||
June 24th, 2007, 20:27 | #13 | |
I haven't handled an M14 so I can't comment on it, but personally I found the Thompson to be incredebly uncomfortable to shoulder. I would recommend you find someone who owns one and see how it feels before making a decision.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
June 25th, 2007, 00:41 | #14 |
It just takes some getting used to. Also, the Tommy has a wicked rate of fire, and is made of metal, so you can bash that sucker!
|
|
June 25th, 2007, 01:13 | #15 |
AK Guru
|
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|