|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
September 12th, 2007, 19:29 | #16 | |
AK Guru
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
September 12th, 2007, 20:35 | #17 |
Because everyone has a different idea of what is best? Center of mass is quicker under stress, and even used in competitions.
Nobody in International Shooting Union (includes the Olympics) teaches to aim at the bottom of the target. IPSC and other combat shooting techniques say to aim for the center of mass/target. It makes no sense to aim for an edge or a small target, does it? |
|
September 12th, 2007, 20:59 | #18 | |
Quote:
Chances are a soldier will forget to adjust the elevation in the heat of battle. Better to have the point of impact lower to increase the hit rate if a soldier makes a mistake. MD
__________________
WOLFPACK U-96 Cry Havoc, Let slip the Dogs of War! "Opportunities multiply as they are seized." - Sun Tzu, The Art of War |
||
September 12th, 2007, 21:09 | #19 |
Agreed, the range does matter. But for airsoft it's not much of an issue.
Even at long ranges, center of mass makes sense because you still have a lot of leeway in all directions if you aim for the center. The way it's described; if you shoot low you hit the ground. If you aim at center you will at least hit the lower target area or the upper area, or side to side. It's far simpler to show than to describe. |
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|