December 13th, 2011, 15:39 | #16 |
aka coachster
|
|
December 13th, 2011, 15:47 | #17 |
December 13th, 2011, 16:13 | #18 | |
Quote:
http://ardrone.parrot.com/parrot-ar-drone/usa Never used it for airsoft. Too afraid it would get shot
__________________
H-61 "Acta non verba" They see us rollin, they hatin... |
||
December 13th, 2011, 16:22 | #19 | |
Quote:
You can remove the pilot more or less if you can program the uav to be controlled to go to a "waypoint" and then circle. Point and... click.... http://www.botachtactical.com/acrmsdimali.html |
||
December 13th, 2011, 16:30 | #20 |
Prancercise Guru
|
Funny though how this comes up right after Iran pops up with a drone.
__________________
Airsoft, where nothing is hurt but feelings. |
December 13th, 2011, 16:37 | #21 |
Well that's kinda obvious, this is Iran's reverse-engineered budget-version of the RQ-170 made in collaboration with China's Element/Z-Tactical replica corporation.
__________________
WTS: King Arms/Madbull Mk18 Mod1 - VFC Mk17 SCAR-H midcap mags, FDE - VFC Mk17 SCAR-H + PWS rail, FDE WTB/WTT: CSOR gear, BFG, Tyr, Crye, etc |
|
December 13th, 2011, 16:50 | #22 |
December 13th, 2011, 18:40 | #23 | |
Crackers
|
Quote:
|
|
December 13th, 2011, 19:15 | #24 |
Prancercise Guru
|
No the human drone has double force field immunity.
Yes I know that sounds ludicrous but so does any rule that grants an advantage to only one side.
__________________
Airsoft, where nothing is hurt but feelings. |
December 13th, 2011, 19:26 | #25 |
Crackers
|
|
December 13th, 2011, 19:33 | #26 | |
Polycarb or other composite is much heavier than Z-foam, though as a type of appliqué armour it might not be a bad idea.
Larger airplanes have no bearing on altitude.. only difference is you can see them further away. They can however generally carry more "equipment". Disadvantage is you need pretty close to an actual runway -a nice long, paved pathway a good 300' long with no trees obstructing either end. Logistics become hard with large RC planes. The larger the plane the more skill it takes to fly them as well. These things are significantly more difficult to fly than RC cars are to drive. Duration also becomes an issue. Large planes can't fly any longer than smaller ones (generally). If you get into longer duration, FPV, nav systems, etc. your costs start to go up exponentially. Weight is a severe enemy of small craft. Planes scale linearly... aerodynamics don't. Numbers pulled out of my ass, but along the lines of a 50% size reduction in the lifting surface equates to 85% reduction in lift. The large RC planes that are capable of doing all that cost several thousand, or are 100% scratch built. No trying to shoot down (har har) anyone's ideas.. Like I said, I've considered this at length, at for the most part the cost and logistics just doesn't make it worth it. Yet. The two big things for me with huang's idea is: 1) Duration, and 2) Cost of airframe replacement.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by kalnaren; December 13th, 2011 at 19:38.. |
||
December 13th, 2011, 19:39 | #27 |
Many ppl build fpv setups with a multiplex easystar. Durable plane, cheap, can carry a reasonable payload of electronics and large batteries, and is relatively easy to fly. I would think it should make an excellent drone platform. Also glides well so It can stay in the air a long ass time..
|
|
December 13th, 2011, 19:46 | #28 | |
If you're careful you could probably get 20-30 minutes out of an Easystar, depending on conditions.
Another one I might use as a platform is a HZ Supercub. Shorter duration but much higher payload.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
December 13th, 2011, 20:23 | #29 |
Prancercise Guru
|
What about one of the blimps you see at the arena? As long as it's a calm day.
You could even drop prizes on people (BB Bastard I'm looking at you).
__________________
Airsoft, where nothing is hurt but feelings. |
December 13th, 2011, 21:32 | #30 | |
Possible. I don't know a lot about RC blimps.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
Bookmarks |
|
|